Darren Bartlett


Darren’s attention to detail has led to a busy practice with a particular emphasis and expertise in claims arising out of road traffic accidents involving credit hire, personal injury and those cases involving fraud and where findings of fundamental dishonesty are sought or trying to be avoided. He accepts instructions from both Claimants and Defendants.

Darren is unusual amongst barristers in that he actually enjoys credit hire work and happily accepts instructions in those cases in the upper reaches of the fast track and multi-track all over the country and as a result is regularly seen in courts across England and Wales.

Clients not only receive excellent legal advice but advice which is practical and commercially based.

Darren had considerable experience of other careers before he joined the Bar.

After leaving University with a degree in Electronic Systems Engineering Darren enjoyed a career as an Army officer in the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers. Following this he incorporated and ran two companies with great success; firstly as a Managing Director of a company dealing with international property sales for 7 years and secondly managing his own I.T. business for several years before coming to the Bar.

Darren’s practice historically involved a wide range of civil matters. He has a wealth of advocacy experience in all types of interlocutory applications and fast track and multi-track trials in the County Court and High Court. He appeared for the Appellant in the case of Howlett v Davies [2017] EWCA Civ 1696, [2017] WLR(D) 715 which considered fundamental dishonesty and QOWCS.

Given his engineering and technical background, Darren has an obvious advantage and interest in matters that involve engineering or other technical evidence.

Recent Cases

  • Represented the Appellant Howlett v Davies [2017] EWCA Civ 1696 where the Court of Appeal considered and clarified: (i) whether Defendant insurers needed to plead and put in cross examination dishonesty or fraud before such a finding can be made by the court; and (ii) the meaning of fundamental dishonesty.
  • Multi-track case acting for the Defendant insurer defending a claim of personal injury and credit hire. Darren was consulted at a relatively advanced stage of proceedings to advise. As a result of Darren’s advice, the Defence was successfully amended to plead fraud. Procedurally very complex litigation that resulted in one Claimant discontinuing on day of trial and the other Claimant not attending trial.
  • Darren advised and acted for a company involved in a long running and acrimonious dispute involving trespass to goods, injunctions and breach of contract. Damages were awarded to Darren’s client at a multi-track trial in excess of £95,000 and interim costs of £30,000.
  • Darren acted for the Claimant in a credit hire claim of some £29,000 but allocated to the Fast Track. Darren advised on the evidence and advised that several key areas needed addressing. Those evidential issues addressed, at trial Darren obtained judgment for the full amount of the credit hire sought.
  • Fast Track matter in which Defendant insurer had suspicions a personal injury claim was fraudulent or at least fundamentally dishonest. As a result of Darren’s robust cross examination of the Claimants, the Defendant applied to amend its pleading at the end of the cross examination. Judge subsequently made findings of fraud.
  • Darren acted for several Defendants who were (correctly) pursued for breach of restraint of trade clauses in their employment contracts. As a result of Darren’s advice the Defendants managed to ‘extract’ themselves from an apparently hopeless litigation with an award of costs after succeeding in an interlocutory application.
  • Darren acted for the Defendant insurer in a personal injury matter where a passenger of a vehicle had caught her hand in a closing car window. Darren successfully obtained summary judgment.
  • Darren acted for the Defendant insurer in a motorcycle credit hire claim of some £30,000. At trial the Judge found the Claimant had no need to hire a vehicle and dismissed the claims./ The Judge further found the Claimant was not impecunious. Defendant insurer awarded 75% of its costs.
  • Darren acted for Claimants in a neighbour dispute involving trespass and harassment. Darren successfully argued that summary judgment should be granted on some of the claim. Matter ultimately settled at PTPH.
  • Multi-track case acting for the Defendant insurer in a multi vehicle collision where liability, causation and quantum were all in dispute between the numerous parties. Darren’s insurer clients was not found liable and awarded substantial costs.
  • Darren acted for the Defendant’s insurer in a fast track matter that resulted in a finding of split liability in the Claimant’s favour. As a result of Darren’s cross examination, though, a finding of fundamental dishonesty was made in relation to the claim for personal injury and physiotherapy. At a subsequent hearing the Defendant was permitted to resile from a previous Part 36 offer, which the Defendant had purported to accept, and the Claimant was ultimately committed with costs being awarded to the Defendant.
  • Representation of an Appellant who, after different Counsel had represented him in the Land Tribunal, wished to appeal the Tribunal’s findings of fact. As a result of Darren’s forensic analysis and detailed Skeleton and Chronology the Respondent conceded the Appeal and settled in a sum in excess of £350,000

Reported Cases


  • GDL (Distinction) College of Law, Guildford – Second Best Student mark
  • BVC (Outstanding) College of Law, London – Best Student
  • LLB (First Class Hons) College of Law, London
  • LLB (Hons)(Electronic Systems Engineering) BEng (Hons), Cranfield University

search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close